<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marketing Essentials International &#187; Surveys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skipsphotonetwork.com/category/surveys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skipsphotonetwork.com</link>
	<description>Marketing Consulting for the Photography Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Poll Results: Do You Shoot Film?</title>
		<link>http://skipsphotonetwork.com/2010/01/first-poll-results-do-you-shoot-film/</link>
		<comments>http://skipsphotonetwork.com/2010/01/first-poll-results-do-you-shoot-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skipsphotonetwork.com/?p=2413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The results are in!  Although I rarely shoot film myself anymore, my roots, like so many photographers out there today, are in film.  I love the richness of virtually anything Fujifilm makes and I keep finding more and more photographers refusing to give up film.  I&#8217;ve even run into a few who have gone back to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results are in!  Although I rarely shoot film myself anymore, my roots, like so many photographers out there today, are in film.  I love the richness of virtually anything <a href="http://www.fujifilmusa.com/products/professional_photography/index.html">Fujifilm</a> makes and I keep finding more and more photographers refusing to give up film.  I&#8217;ve even run into a few who have gone back to film, combining the best of both worlds &#8211; shooting film, scanning the images and working with digital files.</p>
<p>The actual statistics on the survey showed almost 8% of photographers are shooting film exclusively, while 9% said less than 50% of the time. <a href="http://www.josevillablog.com"> Jose Villa </a>would be a great example of a photographer totally dedicated to film, with <a href="http://www.joebuissink.com">Joe Buissink</a> in the category of shooting both film and digital.  The remaining 83% cast their votes for &#8220;not at all&#8221; and &#8220;rarely&#8221;, which isn&#8217;t surprising.  I&#8217;m not about to proclaim myself a rocket scientist, but 322 people answered the poll, enough to simply make it an interesting statistic.</p>
<p>Jose and Joe aren&#8217;t alone.  Check out <a href="http://www.elizabethmessina.com">Elizabeth Messina</a>, <a href="http://www.jonathancanlasphotography.com">Jonathan Canlas</a>, <a href="http://www.lisalefkowitz.com">Lisa Lefkowitz </a>and<a href="http://www.rodneyloughjr.com"> Rodney Lough Jr</a> just to name a few.  All film shooters and each doing remarkable work.</p>
<p>About four years ago I was at a gallery opening of <a href="http://www.chrisrainier.com">Chris Ranier&#8217;s </a>in Santa Monica.  The work was shot on Hasselblad with film.  The images were scanned and then printed on an <a href="http://www.epson.com">Epson Stylus 9800</a>, since replaced with even better technology with the <a href="http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Pro/SeriesStylusPro78809880/Overview.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yes">9880</a> and<a href="http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Pro/SeriesStylusPro79009900/Overview.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yes"> 9900</a>. <a href="http://www.media27.com"> Media 27</a>, one of my most favorite creative companies on planet earth, did the images and produced <a href="http://www.ancientmarks.com">Ancient Marks</a>, the subject of the exhibit.   The work was spectacular with an amazing tonal range.  Every image was at least 40&#215;40 and exquisite.   Without question Chris and Media 27 took advantage of both technologies to create some of the most stunning images I&#8217;ve ever seen!</p>
<p>So, while some of you are in mourning over the loss of film, I wouldn&#8217;t wear totally black just yet.   In fact, there was an article in the Sunday Los Angeles Times about 18 months ago that profiled a wedding photographer in L.A.  She talked about how she shoots exclusively on film, positioning herself as an artist and a craftsman!  </p>
<p>What goes around, comes around and it sure is fun seeing that it&#8217;s film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skipsphotonetwork.com/2010/01/first-poll-results-do-you-shoot-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

